Complaint #1471337 submitted on 07/16/2015 relating to Mark A. Kirkorsky, PC. Complaint relates to Debt collection I do not know - Taking/threatening an illegal action Seized/Attempted to seize property.
Complaint was submitted via Web and sent to the company on Tuesday 21st July 2015.
The debt was charged off as a profit and loss cross collateralizion of home equity line of credit and a credit card in 2008. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX hired the firm of Mark Kirosky to file a judgment. The debt originated when I lived in XXXX. I was sued after I moved to XXXX. I have been a XXXX residents for 7 years and the law office of Mark Kirosky continues to send writ of garnishments to all of my employers. Every employer has interpretated the withholding in XXXX differently based on whether or not they have offices in XXXX. Even though I live and work in XXXX. XXXX XXXX allowed my wages to be garnished. However XXXX XXXX XXXX has not. My company got bought out by XXXX XXXX XXXX based out of XXXX. However I still work and live in XXXX. I spoke to my new HR admin about my situation and she is researching on whether my wages can be garnished or not. However XXXX law prohibits this practice. But my employer may not want to be involved in this matter and take the path of least resistance and allow the garnishment.
Also Mark Kirkorsky office pulls my credit every 60 days. They continue to re-age my debt even though I have made no contact or any payments. They have been unscrupulous and send legal documents monthly. They do not have the right to garnish my wages in XXXX for an unsecured consumer debt. They can not falsely report payments and delinquent payments to re-age my debt with credit reporting agencies.
Company | Mark A. Kirkorsky, PC |
Complaint ID | 1471337 |
Date Received | 07/16/2015 |
Product | Debt collection I do not know |
Issue | Taking/threatening an illegal action Seized/Attempted to seize property |
State/ZIP Code | TX 750XX |
Consumer Consent | Consent provided |
Company Public Response | |
Company Response To Customer | Closed with explanation |
Submitted | Web 07/21/2015 |
Result | Timely Response: Yes, Consumer Disputed: No |
Leave your comments and feedback below.