Complaint #1299895 submitted on 03/25/2015 relating to JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Complaint relates to Mortgage Conventional fixed mortgage - Loan modification,collection,foreclosure .
Complaint was submitted via Web and sent to the company on Wednesday 25th March 2015.
The primary reason for my complaint is that Chase Mortgage, who is the servicer for my loan ( # XXXX ), is in violation of dual tracking. Chase has notified me of a foreclosure date of XXXX XXXX, 2015, while I am in active consideration for a modification. I have submitted my full application for a modification on XXXX XXXX, 2015. They requested additional information, which I sent to them on XXXX XXXX, 2015. I received a letter on XXXX XXXX, 2015 notifying me of a foreclosure sale date of XXXX XXXX. I called and spoke to a customer assistance specialist at Chase on the XXXX of XXXX. They explained that the information I submitted needed to be resubmitted with some corrections, which I immediately corrected and faxed back to them on XXXX XXXX. I also questioned why a foreclosure sale had been scheduled when I am in active consideration for a modification. The specialist told me that once they had everything, the application would be submitted to underwriting and that at that time the sale could be postponed. I have submitted several modification applications with this lender. They have repeatedly made errors in processing the modification and in calculating my income. The lender is a private lender ( XXXX XXXX XXXX Bank of XXXX XXXX, CA ) and does not participate in HAMP. They do however ; supposedly have their own modification program. My goal is to avoid foreclosure and to secure a modification. If that is not possible, then I would like to have time to pursue a short sale.
Company | JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
Complaint ID | 1299895 |
Date Received | 03/25/2015 |
Product | Mortgage Conventional fixed mortgage |
Issue | Loan modification,collection,foreclosure |
State/ZIP Code | MA 014XX |
Consumer Consent | Consent provided |
Company Public Response | |
Company Response To Customer | Closed with explanation |
Submitted | Web 03/25/2015 |
Result | Timely Response: Yes, Consumer Disputed: No |
Leave your comments and feedback below.