Complaint #1704215 submitted on 12/16/2015 relating to Alorica Inc.. Complaint relates to Debt collection Medical - Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed Debt was paid.
Complaint was submitted via Web and sent to the company on Wednesday 16th December 2015.
On XXXX XXXX 2014 I was in the emergency room at XXXX XXXX XXXX Co. I have double insurance coverage and both companies were billed the total amount instead of billing the secondary only what the primary did not pay. The secondary assumed there was no other insurance and issued an Explanation of Benefits stating {$370.00} was owed. The primary insurance payed all but he {$250.00} deductible and I payed that. The hospital had then been payed the total contracted amount. We contacted XXXX four times and they would not re-bill the Secondary insurance company insisting the problem was the insurance companies fault. We solved the problem by providing information to the secondary insurance company and they reissued a new XXXX stating nothing was owed because the entire contracted amount was payed by the primary insurance company and the deductible was covered by me. XXXX turned the matter over to XXXX XXXX debt collectors. When we explained to XXXX Advantage and sent them the written Explanation of benefits they dropped the matter. XXXX then turned us into another debt collector called Global Receivables. Global receivables does not want to receive any information from us concerning the matter. I told them I would send them XXXX XXXX 's from the insurance companies and they said no. We have been harassed for over a year with threatening phone calls and letters.
Older American
Company | Alorica Inc. |
Complaint ID | 1704215 |
Date Received | 12/16/2015 |
Product | Debt collection Medical |
Issue | Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed Debt was paid |
State/ZIP Code | CO 800XX |
Consumer Consent | Consent provided |
Company Public Response | |
Company Response To Customer | Closed with non-monetary relief |
Submitted | Web 12/16/2015 |
Result | Timely Response: No, Consumer Disputed: No |
Leave your comments and feedback below.