Complaint #1525111 submitted on 08/18/2015 relating to Javitch, Block & Rathbone LLC. Complaint relates to Debt collection Credit card - False statements or representation Indicated shouldn't respond to lawsuit.
Complaint was submitted via Web and sent to the company on Thursday 27th August 2015.
When I was visiting my investment properties in XXXX, XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX an attorney attempted to serve me with a court order to answer the claim of XXXX XXXX outstanding credit card that I supposedly owed. I answer the court order, explaining that I could not attend any court hearings in XXXX due to my employment obligations in XXXX. I have been a XXXX resident for the last XXXX years and only occasionally visit XXXX, XXXX to conduct on site examinations of my investment properties. Another Court hearing was rescheduled by the Plaintiff attorney. XXXX XXXX XXXX request to XX/XX/XXXX. I again answered the Court Order, explaining that there was no way I could attend the hearing, due to the same reason, my employment in XXXX. Well the hearing was conducted without my presence, and the Plaintiff appealed to the Judge for judgment against me. Judgment was granted, and a lien was recorded against my real estate for {$2700.00} dollars. During the course of this fiasco the Plaintiff produced modified XXXX XXXX statements to the court for viewing, for the years XX/XX/XXXX,XX/XX/XXXX, and XX/XX/XXXX all showing my billing address to be XXXX, XXXX. During those years I had never lived in XXXX and to this day I have never lived in XXXX, for more than XXXX months at a time.
On XX/XX/XXXX I presented a request to the Court, to have the Court Order dismissed and the lien removed, based on the following facts ; that the hearing was presented in the wrong judicial jurisdiction, submission of inaccurate bank statements falsely representing Defendant 's residence, and the expiration of the Statute of Limitations of XXXX Laws governing written contracts to be XXXX years, not XXXX years like in XXXX. Also there was never a mention of the arbitration clauses that were presented in the XXXX XXXX contract with the Defendant as possible options for settling the debt.
In closing I would like to say that throughout these proceedings XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ignored my pleads of defense and at the end acted unethical in his actions and demeanor to have this case won in his favor. Again the arbitration clauses were never brought up.
I can produce additional supportive documents if necessary to prove my claims.
Older American
| Company | Javitch, Block & Rathbone LLC |
| Complaint ID | 1525111 |
| Date Received | 08/18/2015 |
| Product | Debt collection Credit card |
| Issue | False statements or representation Indicated shouldn't respond to lawsuit |
| State/ZIP Code | CA 926XX |
| Consumer Consent | Consent provided |
| Company Public Response | Company chooses not to provide a public response |
| Company Response To Customer | Closed with explanation |
| Submitted | Web 08/27/2015 |
| Result | Timely Response: Yes, Consumer Disputed: Yes |
Leave your comments and feedback below.